Its Curtains for COP 16 OF UNCBD at Cali Colombia
By Malini Shankar
Digital Discourse Foundation
Cali, Colombia 2.11.24
Curtains are drawn close at Cali
Colombia for the 16th Conference of Parties at the United Nations
Convention on Biological Diversity. The “Parties” made a grand yet sincere
attempt at putting People before the Planet – to be a democratic exercise.
There are some bits of good news and some bad.
There has been fiscal commitments
to DSI or Digital Sequence Information, but Sandra Valenzuela of WWF said at a
Press Conference on closing day that fiscal commitment is not the same thing as
funding.
If cop 16 does not resolve issues
of funding we are sitting on a hot potato. COP 16 is all about
implementation... 119 countries have submitted NBSAPs. 44 are revising. 65%
have submitted NBSAPs. Except India, Iran, Russia and Argentina others have
submitted national targets n NBSAPs. Resource mobilization arena nothing is
agreed till everything is agreed. Global north n south have to agree ... New
funds is not the same as funding”.
This COP is about
implementation...COP 16 is close to finalising global plan of action. 1st is
biodiversity and health. Link between biodiversity loss and increase in viruses,
makes Biodiversity conservation critical; at stake is Humanity’s health.
Vishesh Uppal, Director of WWF
India said, while addressing the Press Conference " DSI funding is
absolutely mandatory and has to be finalized here and now. Last mile is a very
steep climb”.
Agreements were reached on Digital
Sequence Information, Article 8(J)
and EBSA at COP16, but critical decisions on finance have been postponed to the
next interim meeting in Bangkok.
The Conference
established a Subsidiary Body on Article 8(J) and related provisions on
Indigenous Peoples and local communities, and adopted a decision on the
multilateral benefit-sharing mechanism from the use of digital sequence
information, but was suspended before adopting the budget and finance-related
decisions.
India has a premier
advantage, - India legislated the Biodiversity Act back in 2002and thanks to
late Former Prime Minister heeding experts like Prof. M.S. Swaminathan,
Biodiversity Committees, and registries have been digitised at national, state,
district and village Panchayat levels. Yes mutually beneficial partnerships are
still to be drawn sustainably.
But if a separate
tribunal or legislative body has to be set up for indigenous people then a
wildlife Parliament is also necessary. Wildlife wardens then become
representatives for the Wildlife.
Putting People before
the Planet – in deference to democratic governance all the same does not
exactly put the Biodiversity conservation on Priority.
Very well said. Although Biodiversity Act in India came into existence in 2002 in India, and state Biodiversity Boards have been formed but these institutions are toothless, actionless and mere eyewash with no impact on Biodiversity on ground. So to save Biodiversity a seperate organization with full powers and visionary policies with adequate funding needs to be in place.
ReplyDeleteInformative piece. I was not aware of this. Thank you.
ReplyDelete