Editorial: Mismanaging aviation monopoly

 
By Malini Shankar 

Digital Discourse Foundation 

The aviation fiasco that led to the near collapse of a leading and successful private sector airline in India is being blamed on the federal Ministry of Aviation’s FDTL instructions. Halting operations of an entire fleet because the airline had not heeded to directives of limiting pilots’ fatigue bespeaks of a lot of rough edges inside the corrosive industry itself. The directive sought to protect the interests of overworked pilots and welfare of the passenger whose safety would be compromised if overworked fatigued pilots were being asked to overwork that too in unfair pay scales.

The Ministry had given the directive with an 18 months window to implement changes…. Meaning, more pilots ought to have been recruited by 1.11.25. Why didn’t Indigo recruit more pilots in this period? Why did the DGCA not hold Indigo accountable by October 2025 itself? This is the one largest question that begs an open, scrutinisable answer. The largest, most profitable airline, sure, is accountable to the customer / passenger.

While passengers are sore with the airline for inaction and for expensive blunders, the Press in India is holding the Government of India to account for a likely business failure. The grey buffer here is… by having to conform to a directive of the Government, the leader in Indian aviation not just lost its face but led to a near collapse of the airline’s profit oriented business model. By the time all the refunds are in place Indigo would have had a clean shave on its account books. Profit orientation to the point of endangering the safety of the passengers. This is precisely what the Government sought to stymie.

Other issues remain unclear. Why did the Aviation regulator – Directorate of Civil Aviation permit Indigo to operate in sectors where other airlines were not operating? This is precisely the reason that Indigo enjoyed monopoly in sectors where no other airline was operating. What about transparency of the roaster system? Does DGCA have access to the roaster system softwares of the airlines? Can passengers too have access to these roaster databases as a new directive please?

Why didn’t other airlines operate in such areas? Primarily Air India: being the flag carrier it had an obligation to operate in non-profitable sectors too, on every tarmac in every airport in India, the flag carrier ought to operate. However, Indigo a private and relatively young airline was not just having monopoly in many sectors but was making unscrupulous profits in monopolistic routes and sectors. Was DGCA then hand in glove with the private sector leader in aviation? Why was profit motive overriding safety considerations of fatigued pilots?

Time was when Air India had flights operating in every single airport in India and every 60 seconds an Air India aircraft was either taking off or landing in some airport in India. Yet the flag carrying airline was and is still operating at a huge loss, despite privatisation. The Press is coming down heavily against Ministry of Civil Aviation for rusting the profit oriented business model of Indigo.

Except Indigo no other airline faced such a shortage of pilots. Why? Answer is Indigo Airlines enjoyed a near monopoly…. Operating in sectors where no other airline operated. That points to lack of competition… implying regulators / Ministry officials were bribed to overlook.

Blaming the counter staff or the Airlines or the Government’s Ministry of Civil Aviation or the regulator Directorate of Civil Aviation only brought out the frustration of the jinxed passengers.

When Liberalisation made way for competition in 1991 many an airline was born but market forces refined the competition and only the best survived to tell the story. But monopolistic trade practices of a profit oriented private sector player in the aviation industry is unhealthy to say the least. The Government must facilitate healthy competition not augment unhealthy monopoly. Skeptics say this crisis is the beginning of the end of liberalisation.  That this unsuccessful model will replicate in other areas of industry and commerce: infrastructure, logistics, textiles, software industry, telecom industry, e-commerce and so on. That should ring alarm bells both in chambers of commerce and industry and in the federal ministries administering India. Ideology maybe one fundamental element to winning elections, but idealism needs to converge with discourse to streamline administration and governance.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

A personal perspective of PTSD / Mental Health of a physically challenged person # Mental Health Day

Daily report 25.02.2025

No lessons learnt from Silkyaara tunnel collapse, apparently