Need to re-sensitise the financial powers that be before COP 16 concludes
By Malini Shankar
Fruit tree plantation has manifold benefits Picture Credit: Accion Fraterna Ecology Centre, Anantapur |
The 16th Conference of Parties of the United Nations’ Convention on Biological Diversity at Cali in Colombia remained inconclusive almost wholly because fiscal commitments did not crystalise. The need for fiscal commitments is mandatory given the colossal gaps in meeting the Targets.
“COP 16.2 will focus on several critical areas:
- Establishing
systems to monitor and assess progress toward biodiversity targets,
ensuring transparency and accountability.
- The
Planning, Monitoring, Reporting, and Review (PMRR) Mechanism is a critical
component for ensuring accountability and progress in implementing the
Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework (KMGBF). Decisions during
the resumed sessions will shape how progress toward KMGBF implementation
will be assessed at COP 17.
- The
Financial Mechanism under the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity
Framework (KMGBF) is essential for mobilizing resources to implement the
framework effectively, especially in developing countries. Discussions on
the financial mechanism during the resumed sessions will focus on the
Global Environment Facility (GEF), which serves as the financial mechanism
for the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD), and the newly
established Global Biodiversity Framework Fund (GBFF)” says an official
release from the Secretariat of the United Nations’ Convention on Biological
Diversity.
Financial commitments is in the range of US $
200 billion per year that is needed by UNCBD. Let’s take a look at what this $ 200
billion per year is needed for.
Much was made of putting People before the Planet. But, to conserve biodiversity means tree feeling has to be sustainably
managed. If poor people need firewood then sustainable alternatives need to be
expeditiously provided. Otherwise biodiversity loss will be sustained instead
of sustainably developing humankind! We don’t want that!
Mitigating biodiversity loss is not just an
administrative initiative of notifying more Protected Areas: Like Tiger Reserves, Conservation Areas National Parks, Wildlife Sanctuaries or Reserved Forests. It means, if an urban property developer fells X amount of trees to
construct a concrete jungle / heat island the property / land owner as well as the
developer is bound to replant X (2) the amount of trees felled. This extra tree
growth will replenish oxygen and ground water reserves, will not only provide habitat
for avian and urban fauna, and insects and reptiles, but will sequester and act
as a carbon sink, increase moisture content in the soil and acts as a perfect
catchment area for monsoons and absorb the power of urban floods. These are
critical factors in Climate Change mitigation and adaptation.
Urban floods is a direct consequence of lack of
planning land use and disrespect to urban greenery. That has expedited Climate
Change to our detriment.
Stymieing biodiversity loss asks for each
Indian to plant 1% of trees of the country’s population which is as of 14th
December 1456811025. That means every Indian must plant atleast 1,40,000,000 fruit
trees per year for 10 years. Thereafter every Indian must plant 1,40,000,000
bamboo saplings per year; thereafter for the next decade every Indian must
plant 1,40,000,000 Ficus trees per year and so on.
Apart from this there is a need for:
1. Agroforestry,
W Watershed
management,
2.
Soil
conservation,
3.
Installation
of renewable energy supply on a per capita basis,
4.
Cleansing
oceans,
5.
Wetland
management,
6.
Conservation
of endangered fauna and flora,
7.
Replenishment
of ground water table and
8.
Securing
water security for future generations;
9.
Securing
food and livelihood security for an unknown future population density;
A Agroforestry plantations hold manifold benefits like soil fertility, ground water replenishment, malnutrition mitigation, rural livelihood security and so on...
10.
Reversing
the Industrial Revolution to sustainable levels by reducing emissions; and only
thereafter
11.
Re-green
the planet…
All of which needs scientific approach and
sustainable development. Planning is the key. Policy guidelines and legislative support
cannot be compromised upon. It then becomes the Media’s responsibility to re-sensitise
the Private Sector and render a whole new meaning to corporate social responsibility.
Therein lies the crux of the issue at Concluding
Sessions in Rome in February 2025.
I get the feeling that it is a race against time to evolve sustainable habits and reverse the damage. Those big numbers seem unachievable unless it is a national effort - a "moonshot" driven by these international fora. Great to see the media playing its role.
ReplyDeleteMedia always makes people aware. Thank you media. We all should take a pledge to make our earth green.
ReplyDelete