COP 16(2) of UNCBD has drawn to a close
By Malini Shankar
Rome 28.02.2025
The resumed session of the 16th
Conference of Parties to the United Nations Convention on Biological Diversity
has drawn to a close somewhat inconclusively in Rome. Herculean efforts were
made in Rome to launch the Cali Fund to fund DSI or Digital Sequencing
Information.
Signatory Nations or Parties are hesitant
to deposit the funding in the Global Environment Facility bowing to
apprehensions that developed countries will bully emerging economies where the
funding is critically required to stymie Biodiversity Loss.
DSI fund makes a start towards
equity in Biodiversity Management through the Cali Fund for instance. DSI is a biodiversity
funding mechanism to get private sector entities that use Data from genetic
resources and natural resources for manufacturing – to share a slice of their
profits by making contributions to the Cali Fund which will help Biodiversity
rich nations to prevent
and reverse Biodiversity Loss.
Typically biotech companies,
pharma companies, cosmetic industries, floriculture and sericulture industries,
fishing companies, food processing companies have so far not paid back to the ‘genetic
pool’ – the resource base of their manufacturing – thus Biodiversity conservation
stands to benefit from DSI funding.
How will this fund prevent Biodiversity Loss?
In the Indian context more
Protected Areas will likely be earmarked for Tiger Reserves and the funding
will help relocate forest dwellers and squatters to outside the periphery of
the Tiger Reserve which calls for big compensation packages and creation of
sustainable source of livelihood security. Creating alternative dwelling spaces,
livelihood options, food security and a “civilised place” for relocated
evacuees is an onerous fiscal challenge.
The state level Biodiversity boards are documenting biodiverse wealth so as to allow stakeholders to have a stake in sustainable use of the endemic biodiversity sustainably. It could be anything from sea grass to mangroves to Henna leaves, fish stock or medicinal plants. Ideally the stakeholder population harvests the biodiverse wealth in lieu of protection and patrolling of the Protected Area where the biodiversity thrives.
Or schemes like MNREGA can do
with funding when utilised by Islanders for cultivation of medicinal plants. This
can lead to infinite yet constructive partnerships for biodiversity
conservation.
Constructive engagement can be
creative … it only needs collective will.
Comments
Post a Comment